ComputerBB

This is where we get to bash AMD even though the owner of this site loves AMD
Say all the stuff you want!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This room is for intel people to make fun of AMD (even though you amd people are going to be were's the proof just lay off intel only just for fun)

AMD est bete.

hail Intel and the P4. They are teh greatest. Yeah....right.........ummmm i mean.....NO.


Oh, and you better be prepared to back your your "AMD bashing" with facts and links. There is no reason for an Intel at the moment.

Intel all the way

This is the only safe haven for INTEL fans since the entire forums is an AMD controlled enviroment. PM outperforms AMD 64's on laptops!!!!!!!!!!!!

also they last longer

they may last longer, but they dont outperform

hmmm?! I don't think so!

well, I think so. And this about the best benchamrking you are going to find between the two. Centrino in the Dell 8600 and the Athlon in the Voodoo:M855

http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.html?i=1921&p=7

thats not against the best PM, you not even sure if thats the one with 2Mb L2 cache

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,a ... g,2,00.asp
read it and weap

The_Man wrote:thats not against the best PM, you not even sure if thats the one with 2Mb L2 cache

It was the two best given at that point in time, that is the best that is currently released, not what has been "paper launched" and only given to reviewrs.

The_Man wrote:http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,116264,pg,2,00.asp
read it and weap

Read and weep for what? That proves nothing, it gives no good comparison between the mobile Athlon 64 and the Pentium M, none. Sorry can't say I am weeping

whateever you have to say

The Athlon 64 FX-51 creams all of those CPUs. AMD now has the Athlon 64 FX-53s. Also, 3800 ~= FX-53 ~= 3700. Thus, 3700 in a notebook is #1.

All I am asking is for links to back up your claims. Looking at that site, it only shows the Pentium-M's score, not the Mobile A64. It has a score of N/A. Som obviously they weren't trying to compare the two processors (which its hard to do on a laptop system, getting two with similiar setups).

Agressor Prime: we were discussing the Mobile processors, there is no dispute on desktops

The mobile A64 is a better performer than Pentium_M (or Centrino), It is a good processor, has great battery life, but it does not outperform the mobile 64.

All I have to say is that AMDs get more work done per clock cycle than Intels

You can do the same stuff with an intel processor.. AMD BASHING!!!!!!!

Neo-Tebow2000 wrote:You can do the same stuff with an intel processor.. AMD BASHING!!!!!!!

and still for more money!!!!!!

Hey you can even use a VIA C3 processor!!!!

if you look on that link there is one comparison, which i used, and PM did better on the PC World Benchmark 4 then the mobile athalon 64

Oh yeah, THATS a great benchmark to show the overall performance of two processors. Especially when considering we don't know what it benchmarks, what all test it runs. So im deffianntly not going to weep over that

it still shows PM beating it, anyway this is for intel people only unless you want to bash amd with us

Why do you think most people on this forum like AMD? There has to be a reason.

Uh, See how many people like AMD on ocforums.com

I'm not going to allow bashing of a product without legitimate backup. Oh, and one benchmark made by a magazine is not going to be biased anyway? Besides, it is only one benchmark, each architecture has its benefits and strong points. So saying one is better by looking at only one benchmark is ridiculous. Especially when comparing a processor that isnt publically available

I guess bashing AMD make you feel better for having purchased the worst processor architecture ever developed, Netburst for the P4

Wow, talk about a turn around in this thread

Why would people even like AMD over Intel though including extremists?

monte you don't get the gist of it, this is a place for people to make fun of amd even though they are better in some ways. this place is for amusement of intel people making fun of amd. i don''t care if what i say or other people say is complete BS anyway amd is a german company. Looking at germany's history leads me to belive this will be only temporary time where AMD will be king.

Only some of the Fabs are in Germany.
The HeadQuarters are in California.

I am not allowing the "bashing" of a company without any legit info to back up post with. So if your posting something against AMD or any company, that is incorrect I will be there to straighten things out. After all this is a help forum, why do senseless fanboy ashing here?

Headquarters: Santa Clara, California

AMD was originaly just a memory company (i think) and still have a good market in flash memory. Only their Processor fabs are in germany.

Ok, I am With Monte84. If any of you can prove to us, and other forum members that the P4 or Intel for that matter is superior to AMD, go right ahead, but until then, just shut it. I seriously want to see some good links here, and just know that i have a rebuttle. There many users that know that the Athlon 64 is simply put...SUPERIOR...to the P4 architecture, and any other architecture that Intel puts out, at least for the next 18 months! lol. really what do you Intel guys have over us AMD guys on the desktop side..lets not mention the Ownage the opteron is putting on Intel...lets stick to Desktop.

LVS

AMD sucks he he hehe he he hehe!

Wow, you must be a young little kid.

you still don't get it do you monte.

The_Man wrote:you still don't get it do you monte.

Yeah, your just trying to feel better about your bad purchase decision.

Seriously, is a thread like this, on a SUPPORT forum, not useless???
I think it is. I am sure others would agree.

this has nothing to do with my bad purchase decision (to me it wasn't bad), I don't know why you think it does. It may be useless but its still here for anybody who doesn't like amd.

its just sarcasim, guess you didn't catch that.

I'm a bit slow on some sarcasim thngs.