Huge Perfomance Lost by Intel CPUs!!!

Aggressor Prime · Post by **Aggressor Prime** » January 17th, 2004, 4:51 am

Test:
Pentium 4 2.8GHz HT
Athlon XP 2100 (1.74GHz)
Results:
Athlon XP 2100=3* faster
Conclusion:
AMD 1.73GHz= Intel 16.8 GHz!!!

Post by **ccb056** » January 17th, 2004, 4:27 pm

um, yeah, why dont you show us how you got that info????

Aggressor Prime · Post by **Aggressor Prime** » January 17th, 2004, 4:32 pm

ccb056 wrote:um, yeah, why dont you show us how you got that info????

Right now SomeOne deleted my test results on this forum's server.
Prob. Smartweb.
I'm getting a new test instrument since he refuses to repeat the same test.
Yet this is difficult since he thinks a CPU's power is not measured by Flops, or complex caculations per second.

Post by **ccb056** » January 17th, 2004, 4:55 pm

um, riiiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttt

Aggressor Prime · Post by **Aggressor Prime** » January 17th, 2004, 5:23 pm

P4 2.8GHz HT (2.8GHz : 200MHz FSB)>Athlon XP 2400 (2.0GHz : 133MHz FSB)
P4 2.8C- 8069 ALU MIPS; 3340 FPU MFLOPS; 6049 iSSE2 MFLOPS
Athlon XP 2400- 7564 ALU MIPS; 3155 FPU MFLOPS

Guest · Post by **Guest** » January 17th, 2004, 7:48 pm

that doesnt' look like Athlon Xp is 3x faster, does it.

Aggressor Prime · Post by **Aggressor Prime** » January 17th, 2004, 7:58 pm

Anonymous wrote:that doesnt' look like Athlon Xp is 3x faster, does it.

Diff. Benchmarks have diff. problems for the MFlop caculation. This is 1/5 we will use.

Aggressor Prime · Post by **Aggressor Prime** » January 18th, 2004, 5:03 pm

P4 MIPS-7309 ALU
P4 MFLOPS-3003 FPU/5316 iSSE2

ComputerBB

Huge Perfomance Lost by Intel CPUs!!!

Huge Perfomance Lost by Intel CPUs!!!

New Results with SiSoftware

Athlon XP 2400 beats P4 2.4C