AMD Athlon 64 3500 vs Intel Xeon 3.6GHz EM64T

Talk about PC parts, builds, upgrades, and hardware troubleshooting.
Post Reply
Aggressor Prime
Registered User
Posts: 923
Joined: January 15th, 2004, 1:51 am
Location: PTMC Headquarters
Contact:
Contact Aggressor Prime

AMD Athlon 64 3500 vs Intel Xeon 3.6GHz EM64T

Post by Aggressor Prime »

In 3/14 tests, the AMD Athlon 64 3500 wins. In the rest, the Intel Xeon 3.6GHz EM64T wins. These tests were done with one CPU with a 64-Bit OS and in a 64-Bit environment. However, while the Intel Xeon 3.6GHz EM64T costs $850, the AMD Athlon 64 3500 costs $500 less. Also, we haven't yet seen the Opterons. This would be like an Opteron 246 vs that Xeon. Future tests could include the Opteron 248 and the Opteron 250. As for the Pentium 4 EM64T CPUs, AMD still has their 3800 and FX-53.

More here.
Athlon XP 3200 3DMark05 Score: 3460 GeForce 6600 GT 3DMark05 Score: 3132 14304 SETI Results: Athlon 64 2800 Athlon XP 3200 Athlon XP 2100 Athlon XP 1800 Pentium 3 Celeron 667MHz If you haven't played Descent 3, you aren't a gamer.
Top
monte84
Registered User
Posts: 208
Joined: May 31st, 2004, 4:13 am

Post by monte84 »

As has been stated on some other forums (this is a rather hot topic atm) some of the results are well...a little out of place. Like using the A64's 32-bit instead of 64bit scores.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Hardware”