AMD, preparing for a big bang?

Talk about PC parts, builds, upgrades, and hardware troubleshooting.
Post Reply
Aggressor Prime
Registered User
Posts: 923
Joined: January 15th, 2004, 1:51 am
Location: PTMC Headquarters
Contact:

AMD, preparing for a big bang?

Post by Aggressor Prime »

AMD's last improvement in Cache 1 was from 250m to 180nm: 64KB to 128KB.

They should have had 256KB in their 130nm CPUs.
The 90nm CPUs will still use 128KB C1, though they should have 512KB.
But why the lay back?
So they can surprise Intel with a 1MB of Cache 1 with the 2005 launch of the 65nm K9s!

And for Cache 2:
180nm - 256KB
130nm - 1MB (Surprise combo w/ 64-Bit)
90nm - 2MB
65nm - 4MB

Intel Cache 3:
130nm - 2MB
90nm - 4MB
65nm - 8MB

AMD had to keep the Cache 2 high to continue to compete and to disguise the cache 1 boost.

Plus, the K9s should have Cache 3 (very large)!

My guess is, along with the dual cores (both having Hyper Threading), that the K9s will have 1MB of Cache 1, 4MB of Cache 2, and 8MB of Cache 3.

Also they will feature much more GHZ, AMD wants to win the 10GHz race.

Of course, this is not the Pentium EEs and Xeons that these High-End K9s are going against, AMD is attacking Intel's core, the Itanium!
Athlon XP 3200 3DMark05 Score: 3460 GeForce 6600 GT 3DMark05 Score: 3132 14304 SETI Results: Athlon 64 2800 Athlon XP 3200 Athlon XP 2100 Athlon XP 1800 Pentium 3 Celeron 667MHz If you haven't played Descent 3, you aren't a gamer.
Post Reply