Intel Server Roadmaps

Talk about PC parts, builds, upgrades, and hardware troubleshooting.
Post Reply
Aggressor Prime
Registered User
Posts: 923
Joined: January 15th, 2004, 1:51 am
Location: PTMC Headquarters
Contact:

Intel Server Roadmaps

Post by Aggressor Prime »

Their best CPUs for the start of 2005 will be:
Processor (Xeon MP 3.50+/Itanium 2 1.6) Core (Potomac/Madison 9M) Speed (3.50GHz/1.60GHz) L2 Cache (1MB/256KB) L3 Cache (8MB/9MB) FSB (667MHz/400MHz) Launch Date (Q2'05/Q4'04)

More here.

I have a feeling that the Xeons are going to kill the Itaniums this time. Although they have a lower IPC, they only have 1MB less of L3 Cache. And they have 4X the L2 Cache and 267MHz more FSB. It also has 300MHz more than 2X the GHz of the Itanium. Itanium can finally be dethroned. :)

As for how AMD will compete with this, Opterons running at 2.8GHz with their own memory controllers and that use 50W each sounds 10X better. But for those die-hard Intel fans, you can finally celebrate the victory of the Xeons over the Itaniums. 8)

Good luck Intel. Keep AMD from getting their prices too high. :wink:
(I don't like spending over $100 for a 64-Bit CPU. AMD really needs a huge price drop.)
Athlon XP 3200 3DMark05 Score: 3460 GeForce 6600 GT 3DMark05 Score: 3132 14304 SETI Results: Athlon 64 2800 Athlon XP 3200 Athlon XP 2100 Athlon XP 1800 Pentium 3 Celeron 667MHz If you haven't played Descent 3, you aren't a gamer.
The_Man
Registered User
Posts: 326
Joined: January 25th, 2004, 11:57 pm
Location: Big Easy

Post by The_Man »

Aggressor 100usd for a new technology is really streching it, i think if it has to go that low amd is desparet covering with low prices for all.
Money can buy what you don't have.
Post Reply